The Innovation Journey
Research Integration Background
After 16 years of trauma-informed practice, I recognized that three robust research areas existed independently but had never been systematically combined: memory reconsolidation windows, awe neurobiology, and trauma memory formation.
Research Foundation
My systematic integration approach is now supported by emerging academic research showing that transformative experiences create measurable changes in connectedness and psychological flexibility (University of Louisiana, 2024). This confirms what I’ve observed in practice for more than a decade.
The Systematic Breakthrough
The Impact Method™ doesn’t invent new neuroscience. It systematically integrates established research with precise timing protocols. This creates healing interventions that match the neurobiological intensity of traumatic encoding by deploying competing experiences during optimal modification windows.
Academic Positioning
I’m not claiming to have discovered new brain science. I’m the first person to systematically combine three established research domains with precision timing and personalization protocols that make therapeutic integration possible.
Regional Connections
New Hampshire resident with strong academic ties. One son graduated UNH Cybersecurity (2023), another is a junior at Boston College. I understand both innovative integration and academic validation requirements.
Patent Coverage
Application #63/839,907 and #63/845,439 covers the systematic integration methodology for both coaching and clinical settings, recognizing this represents novel therapeutic protocol development, not basic research discovery.
Research Integration Validation Opportunity
The Research Question
Can systematic integration of memory reconsolidation, awe neurobiology, and trauma memory research create measurable therapeutic outcomes when deployed with precise timing and personalization protocols?
What I Bring to Collaboration
- Novel integration methodology with patent-pending systematic protocols
- Cross-domain measurement tools including custom 40-item assessment spanning all three research areas
- Complete implementation framework (24-page guide integrating established research)
- Active integration data with 5 clients using rigorous cross-domain tracking
- 16 years practical experience identifying gaps between independent research areas
What Academic Partners Provide
- Multi-domain research infrastructure for larger sample validation
- Cross-disciplinary expertise spanning memory, emotion, and trauma research
- Statistical analysis across integrated research domains
- Peer review from memory reconsolidation, awe research, and trauma specialists
- Publication pathways for integration research
Current Research Status
Small sample size, but comprehensive integration methodology designed for scaling across multiple research domains. Seeking memory researchers, emotion scientists, or trauma specialists interested in systematic cross-domain validation.
Comprehensive Validation Framework
Development Foundation
- 16 Years Trauma-Informed Practice
- 3 Established Research Domains
- 40 Item Custom Assessment
- 24 Page Implementation Protocols
Systematic Measurement Protocol
Custom Assessment Instrument (IMBAS)
40-item Impact Method™ Baseline Assessment Scale measuring memory intrusion, avoidance patterns, emotional dysregulation, physical symptoms and life functioning across the integrated intervention areas.
Complete Data Collection Framework
- Pre/post session state measurements tracking reconsolidation activation
- Weekly progress monitoring across all three research domains
- Post-awe assignment assessments measuring neurobiological competition
- 30-day and 6-month follow-up protocols for sustained integration effects
- Compliance tracking for timing precision and personalization effectiveness
Implementation Readiness
Complete 24-page practitioner guide integrating protocols from all three research areas: session-by-session reconsolidation targeting, personalized awe experience categorization system, precise timing requirements, and systematic outcome measurement.